Análisis del gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos en Perú en 2007 y 2016 / Out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines and supplies in Peru in 2007 and 2016

INTRODUCCIÓN: El gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos puede afectar financieramente los hogares. Objetivo: Determinar el gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos en Perú y las características de la población con mayor gasto de este tipo en los años 2007 y 2016. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal analítico de la Encuesta Nacional de Hogares sobre Condiciones de Vida y Pobreza 2007 y 2016. Se determinó la media y mediana del gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos en dólares americanos para la población general, y según la presencia de factores descritos en la literatura como asociados al gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron datos de 92 148 encuestados en 2007 y de 130 296 en 2016. En 2007, se encontró una mediana de 3,19 (rango intercuartílico: 0,96 a 7,99) y una media de 8,14 (intervalo de confianza 95%: 7,80 a 8,49) para el gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos. En 2016, la mediana y media de este gasto fueron de 3,55 (rango intercuartílico: 1,48 a 8,88) y 9,68 (intervalo de confianza 95%: 9,37 a 9,99), respectivamente. Para 2016, se encontró un mayor gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos en mujeres, menores de cinco y mayores de 60 años; personas de mayor nivel educativo; tener seguro privado o de las fuerzas armadas; vivir en la región costa y en zona urbana; tener una enfermedad crónica; y ser de los quintiles de gasto per cápita más altos. Entre 2007 y 2016, se incrementó significativamente (p < 0,05) el gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos en los menores de cinco años (p < 0,001), personas no aseguradas (p < 0,001), asegurados en el Seguro Integral de Salud (p < 0,001) o a las fuerzas armadas, para el área urbana y rural (p < 0,001, ambos), y en personas sin enfermedades crónicas (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Se obtuvo el gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos e insumos en población peruana en 2007 y 2016, encontrándose un incremento del mismo entre los años de estudio, existiendo grupos poblacionales con mayor gasto y con aumentos significativos. Se requiere profundizar el estudio de factores asociados al gasto de bolsillo en medicamentos en grupos de mayor vulnerabilidad económico frente al gasto directo en salud en Perú.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies can lead to a heavy financial burden in households. OBJECTIVE: To determine the out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies in Peru and the population groups with the highest out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies in 2007 and 2016. METHODS: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study of the Peruvian National Household Survey on Living and Poverty Conditions for the years 2007 and 2016. Mean and median out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies are reported in USD for the general population, and according to the presence or not of factors described in the literature as associated with out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies. RESULTS: 92 148 and 130 296 participants from 2007 and 2016 were included. In 2007, a median of 3.19 (interquartile range: 0.96 to 7.99) and an average of 8.14 (95% confidence interval: 7.80 to 8.49) were found for the out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies. In 2016, the median and mean out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies were 3.55 (interquartile range: 1.48 to 8.88) and 9.68 (95% confidence interval: 9.37 to 9.99), respectively. For 2016, higher out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies was found in women, children under five and over 60 years of age, people of higher educational level, having private or armed forces insurance, living in the coastal region, and being in one of the highest per capita quintile of expenditure. Between 2007 and 2016, the out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies was significantly increased in children under five (p < 0.001), uninsured persons (p < 0.001), insured to the Seguro Integral de Salud (p < 0.001) or the Armed Forces (p = 0.035), for the urban and rural area (both p < 0.001), and in people without chronic diseases (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies was found in the study period. There were population groups with significant increases in out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies. It is necessary to explore further the factors associated with out-of-pocket spending on medicines and supplies in groups of greater economic vulnerability regarding direct health spending in Peru.

Gasto de bolsillo en salud durante el último año de vida de adultos mayores mexicanos: análisis del Enasem / Out of pocket expenditure on health during the last year of life of Mexican elderly: analysis of the Enasem

Resumen: Objetivo: Estimar el gasto de bolsillo (GB) durante el último año de vida en adultos mayores (AM) mexicanos. Material y métodos: Estimación del GB del último año de vida de AM, ajustando por tipo de manejo, afiliación y causa de muerte. Se emplearon datos del Estudio Nacional de Salud y Envejecimiento en México (2012). Los gastos en medicamentos, consultas médicas y hospitalización durante el año previo a la muerte conforman el GB. El GB se ajustó por inflación y se reporta en dólares americanos 2018. Resultados: La media de GB fue $6 255.3±18 500. En el grupo de atención ambulatoria el GB fue $4 134.9±13 631.3. El GB en hospitalización fue $7 050.6±19 971.0. Conclusiones: La probabilidad de incurrir en GB es menor cuando no se requiere hospitalización. Con hospitalización, la afiliación a la seguridad social y atenderse en hospitales públicos juega un papel protector.

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) during the last year of life in Mexican older adults (OA). Materials and methods: Estimation of the OOPE corresponding to the last year of life of OA, adjusting by type of management, affiliation and cause of death. Data from the National Health and Aging Study in Mexico (2012) were used. To calculate the total OOPE, the expenses in the last year were used in: medications, medical consultations and hospitalization. The OOPE was adjusted for inflation and is reported in US dollars 2018. Results: The mean OOPE was $6 255.3±18 500. In the ambulatory care group, the OOPE was $4 134.9±13 631.3. The OOPE in hospitalization was $7 050.6±19 971.0. Conclusions: The probability of incurre in OOPE is lower when hospitalization is not required. With hospitalization, affiliation to social security and attending to public hospitals plays a protective role.

Custos não médicos diretos e indiretos relacionados ao glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto no Brasil / Non-medical direct and indirect costs related to primary open-angle glaucoma in Brazil

RESUMO Objetivo: Identificar os custos não médicos diretos e indiretos em uma população de pacientes portadores de glaucoma primário de ângulo aberto (GPAA) em tratamento no Brasil. Métodos: A pesquisa dos custos neste estudo transversal foi realizada através de entrevista a uma população de pacientes portadores de GPAA em acompanhamento em um centro de referência para o tratamento do glaucoma na cidade de Juiz de Fora - MG. Para avaliação dos custos não médicos diretos, as seguintes variáveis foram investigadas: gasto com transporte, hospedagem, alimentação e acompanhante para cada consulta. Já na análise dos custos indiretos, avaliou-se: recebimento ou não de benefício social por causa do glaucoma (aposentadoria ou auxílio-doença) e qual o valor anual e perda de dias trabalhados pelo paciente e/ou pelo acompanhante. Os valores médios anuais foram calculados para todo o grupo e para cada estágio evolutivo do glaucoma. Resultados: Setenta e sete pacientes foram incluídos nesta análise (GPAA inicial: 26,0%; GPAA moderado: 24,7% e GPAA avançado: 49,3%). A média do custo não médico direto foi (em reais): 587,47; 660,52 e 708,54 para os glaucomas iniciais, moderados e avançados, respectivamente. Já a média do custo indireto foi: 20.156,75 (GPAA inicial); 26.988,16 (moderado) e 27.263,82 (avançado). Conclusão: Os custos não médicos diretos e indiretos relacionados ao GPAA no Brasil foram identificados. Os custos indiretos são superiores aos custos não médicos diretos e ambos tendem a aumentar com o avanço da doença.

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify direct and indirect non-medical costs in a population of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) receiving treatment in Brazil. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we obtained the costs through an interview with a population of patients with POAG at a glaucoma referral clinic in the city of Juiz de Fora - MG. In order to assess the direct non-medical costs, we investigated the following variables transportation expenses, lodging expenses, food and companion expenses for each visit. In the indirect costs analysis, we assessed the following variables: whether or not social benefits were received because of glaucoma (retirement or sickness benefit) and the annual value and loss of days worked by the patient and/or the companion. We calculated the mean annual values for the whole group and for each glaucoma stage. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included in this analysis (initial POAG: 26.0%, moderate POAG: 24.7% and advanced POAG 49.3%). The mean non-medical direct cost was (in reais): 587.47; 660.52 and 708.54 for the initial, moderate and advanced glaucomas, respectively. The mean indirect cost was: 20,156.75 (initial POAG); 26,988.16 (moderate POAG) and 27,263.82 (advanced POAG). Conclusion: We identified the direct and indirect non-medical costs related to POAG in Brazil. Indirect costs are higher than non-medical direct costs and both tend to increase with disease progression.

Protección financiera en salud: evolución y comparación del gasto de bolsillo de los hogares chilenos / Financial protection for health care expenses provided by public and private systems in Chile

Background: People need a financial protection system to face the high costs of health care. Aim: To compare the financial protection between households affiliated to the Chilean public health financing system (FONASA) or to a private health financing system (ISAPRE). To describe the evolution of protection at the national level between 2007 and 2012. Material and Methods: As proposed by the World Bank, impact indicators to measure the equity and efficiency of the insurance systems were generated. Namely, average out-of-pocket expenses by insurance and average out-of-pocket spending as a percentage of expenditure. Also, the evolution of out-of-pocket spending by quintiles and Gini Coefficient were measured as measure of equity. To determine these, Family Budget Surveys for 2007 and 2012 were used. Results: Household out-of-pocket spending increased by 14.12%. When expressed as a percentage of total expenditure, it grew from 5.6% to 6.2%. Household Gini coefficient and per capita out-of-pocket spending decreased and the ratio between the highest and lowest quintile out-of-pocket increased at both analysis levels. Pocket expense in absolute values or expressed as a percentage of total expenses was higher among persons insured in private systems than those affiliated to the public financing service. Conclusions: Out-of-pocket spending increased for all income groups and people insured in the public system had a lower absolute and relative spending than those insured in private systems.

Desigualdades no comprometimento da renda domiciliar dos brasileiros com gastos privados em assistência odontológica / Inequalities in Brazilian families' income commitment to out-of-pocket spending on dental care / Desigualdades respecto a la renta domiciliaria en el desembolso de los brasileños con gastos privados de asistencia odontológica

O objetivo foi investigar as desigualdades no comprometimento da renda domiciliar com gastos privados em assistência odontológica no Brasil. Foram analisados dados de 55.970 domicílios brasileiros que participaram da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares, de abrangência nacional, no período de 2008-2009. O comprometimento dos gastos privados com assistência odontológica na renda familiar foi calculado pela divisão do gasto médio domiciliar per capita anual pela renda familiar per capita anual e estimado segundo quatro categorias: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10% e ≥ 20%. A análise do comprometimento na renda foi realizada apenas para os domicílios com gasto positivo. Apenas 2.961 (7%) dos domicílios reportaram gastos positivos com assistência em odontologia. No geral, o gasto médio per capita anual foi de R$ 42,19 e, de R$ 602,47 entre aqueles com gasto positivo. Os domicílios que possuem os maiores gastos absolutos com assistência odontológica são aquelas pertencentes à área urbana e ao quinto mais rico. Em contrapartida, os domicílios com maior comprometimento na renda pertencem à área rural e ao quinto mais pobre. Entre os que informaram gasto positivo, 55% dos domicílios do quinto mais pobre comprometeram ≥ 20% de sua renda com assistência odontológica. O percentual é de apenas 6% no grupo mais rico da população. Os domicílios mais pobres das regiões mais ricas (Centro-oeste, Sul e Sudeste) apresentaram os maiores comprometimentos de renda. As desigualdades socioeconômicas nos gastos e no comprometimento de renda com assistência odontológica são evidentes. A avaliação dessas desigualdades torna-se relevante para avaliação e orientação de políticas públicas em saúde.

The study aimed to investigate inequalities in the commitment of family income to private expenditures on dental care in Brazil. Data were analyzed from 55,970 Brazilian households that participated in the nationwide Family Budgets Survey in 2008-2009. The commitment of family income to private spending on dental care was calculated by dividing the mean annual per capita household spending on dental care by the mean annual per capita income, classified in four categories: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 20%. Analysis of income commitment only included households with positive spending. Only 2,961 households (7%) reported positive spending on dental care. Mean annual per capita spending was BRL 42.19 (USD 12.78) overall and BRL 602.47 (USD 182.57) among those with positive spending. Households with the highest absolute expenditures on dental care were those from urban areas and the wealthiest quintile. Meanwhile, households with the highest proportional income commitment were from rural areas and the poorest quintile. Among those that reported positive spending, 55% of the households in the poorest quintile committed ≥ 20% of their income to dental care. The proportion was only 6% in the wealthiest quintile of the population. The poorest households in the wealthiest regions of Brazil (Central, South, and Southeast) showed the highest income commitments. There were striking socioeconomic inequalities in spending and income commitment to dental care. The evaluation of these inequalities is relevant for the evaluation and orientation of public health policies.

El objetivo de este trabajo fue investigar las desigualdades en el desembolso de renta domiciliaria con gastos privados en asistencia odontológica en Brasil. Se analizaron datos de 55.970 domicilios brasileños que participaron en la Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares, de alcance nacional, durante el período de 2008-2009. El desembolso económico privado en asistencia odontológica, respecto a la renta familiar, se calculó mediante la división del gasto medio domiciliario per cápita anual por la renta familiar per cápita anual y estimado según cuatro categorías: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10% y ≥ 20%. El análisis del desembolso económico se realizó sólo para los domicilios con gasto positivo. Sólo 2.961 (7%) de los domicilios informaron de gastos positivos con asistencia en odontología. En general, el gasto medio per cápita anual fue BRL 42,19 y, BRL 602,47 entre quienes contaban con un gasto positivo. Los domicilios que cuentan con los mayores gastos absolutos respecto a la asistencia odontológica son los pertenecientes al área urbana y a la quinta parte más rica. En contrapartida, los domicilios con mayor desembolso de renta pertenecen al área rural y a la quinta parte más pobre. Entre los que informaron de gasto positivo, un 55% de los domicilios de la quinta parte más pobre desembolsaron un ≥ 20% de su renta en asistencia odontológica. El porcentaje es de apenas un 6% en el grupo más rico de la población. Los domicilios más pobres de las regiones más ricas (Centro-oeste, Sur y Sudeste) presentaron los mayores desembolsos de renta. Las desigualdades socioeconómicas en los gastos y en el desembolso de renta con la asistencia odontológica son evidentes. La evaluación de estas desigualdades es relevante para la evaluación y orientación de las políticas públicas en salud.

Costos de hospitalización por diarrea en niños durante el período de circulación de rotavirus en el Noroeste Argentino / Hospitalization costs associated with diarrhea among children during the period of rotavirus circulation in the Northwest region of Argentina

Objetivo. Evaluar los costos médicos directos, gastos de bolsillo y costos indirectos en casos de diarrea aguda hospitalizada en <5 años, en el Hospital de Niños Héctor Quintana de la provincia de Jujuy, durante el período de circulación de rotavirus en la región Noroeste de Argentina. Métodos. Estudio de corte trasversal de costos de enfermedad. Fueron incluidos todos los niños hospitalizados <5 años con diagnóstico de diarrea aguda y deshidratación durante el período de circulación de rotavirus, entre el 1/5/2013 y el 31/10/2013. La evaluación de costos médicos directos se realizó mediante la revisión de historias clínicas, y los gastos de bolsillo y costos indirectos, mediante una encuesta. Para el intervalo de confianza del 95% del costo promedio por paciente, se realizó un análisis probabilístico de 10 000 simulaciones por remuestreo (boostraping). Resultados. Fueron enrolados 105 casos. La edad promedio fue de 18 meses (desvío estándar 12); 62 (59%) fueron varones. El costo médico directo, gasto de bolsillo y pérdida de dinero por lucro cesante promedio por caso fue de AR$ 3413, 6 (2856, 35-3970, 93) (USD 577, 59), AR$ 134, 92 (85, 95-213, 57) (USD 22, 82) y de AR$ 301 (223, 28380, 02) (USD 50, 93), respectivamente. El total del costo por evento hospitalizado fue de AR$ 3849, 52 (3298-4402, 25) (USD 651, 35). Conclusiones. El valor de costo total por evento hospitalizado se encuentra dentro de lo esperado para Latinoamérica. La distribución de costos presenta una proporción importante de costos médicos directos en relación con los gastos de bolsillo (3, 5%) y costos indirectos (7, 8%).

Objective. To assess direct medical costs, out-of-pocket expenses, and indirect costs in cases of hospitalizations for acute diarrhea among children <5 years of age at Hospital de Niños "Héctor Quintana" in the province of Jujuy during the period of rotavirus circulation in the Northwest region of Argentina. Methods. Cross-sectional study on disease-related costs. All children <5 years of age, hospitalized with the diagnosis of acute diarrhea and dehydration during the period of rotavirus circulation between May 1st and October 31st of 2013, were included. The assessment of direct medical costs was done by reviewing medical records whereas out-of-pocket expenses and indirect costs were determined using a survey. For the 95% confidence interval of the average cost per patient, a probabilistic bootstrapping analysis of 10 000 simulations by resampling was done. Results. One hundred and five patients were enrolled. Their average age was 18 months (standard deviation: 12); 62 (59%) were boys. The average direct medical cost, out-of-pocket expense, and lost income per case was ARS 3413.6 (2856.35-3970.93) (USD 577.59), ARS 134.92 (85.95-213.57) (USD 22.82), and ARS 301 (223.28380.02) (USD 50.93), respectively. The total cost per hospitalization event was ARS 3849.52 (32984402.25) (USD 651.35). Conclusions. The total cost per hospitalization event was within what is expected for Latin America. Costs are broken down into direct medical costs (significant share), compared to out-of-pocket expenses (3.5%) and indirect costs (7.8%).

Equity in out-of-pocket payment in Chile

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To assess the distribution of financial burden in Chile, with a focus on the burden and progressivity of out-of-pocket payment. METHODS Based on the principle of ability to pay, we explore factors that contribute to inequities in the health system finance and issues about the burden of out-of-pocket payment, as well as the progressivity and redistributive effect of out-of-pocket payment in Chile. Our analysis is based on data from the 2006 National Survey on Satisfaction and Out-of-Pocket Payments. RESULTS Results from this study indicate evidence of inequity, in spite of the progressivity of the healthcare system. Our analysis also identifies relevant policy variables such as education, insurance system, and method of payment that should be taken into consideration in the ongoing debates and research in improving the Chilean system. CONCLUSIONS In order to reduce the detected disparities among income groups, healthcare priorities should target low-income groups. Furthermore, policies should explore changes in the access to education and its impact on equity.

Gastos privados com saúde bucal no Brasil: análise dos dados da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares, 2008-2009 / Private spending on oral health in Brazil: analysis of data from the Family Budgets Survey, 2008-2009 / Gastos privados con la salud bucal en Brasil: análisis de datos de la Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares, 2008-2009

Resumo: O objetivo foi analisar os gastos privados com assistência odontológica e produtos de higiene bucal dos brasileiros. Foram analisados dados de 55.970 domicílios pesquisados na Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares de 2008-2009. Os gastos foram descritos segundo macrorregiões, estados e capitais do Brasil e de acordo com características socioeconômicas e demográficas dos domicílios (sexo, idade, cor da pele e escolaridade do chefe, renda domiciliar per capita e presença de idoso no domicílio). Os brasileiros gastaram em média no ano R$ 42,19 com serviços de assistência odontológica e R$ 10,27 com produtos de higiene bucal. Desigualdades sociais na distribuição desses gastos segundo as características dos moradores dos domicílios e segundo as diferentes macrorregiões, estados e capitais do país foram encontradas. O presente estudo evidenciou com detalhes quanto e com o que gastam os brasileiros com assistência odontológica e com produtos de higiene bucal. O monitoramento e avaliação desses gastos são condições fundamentais para avaliação e orientação de políticas públicas em saúde bucal.

Abstract: The aim was to analyze Brazilians' private spending on dental care and oral hygiene products. Data were analyzed from 55,970 households in the Family Budgets Survey, 2008-2009. Expenditures were analyzed by major geographic region, state, state capital, and household socioeconomic and demographic characteristics (sex, age, head-of-household's skin color and schooling, per capita household income, and presence of elderly in the household). Brazilians spent an average of BRL 42.19 per year on dental care and BRL 10.27 on oral hygiene products. The study detected social inequalities in the distribution of these expenditures according to household residents' characteristics and the different geographic regions, states, and state capitals. The current study evidenced quantitative and specific details on Brazilians' spending on dental care and oral hygiene products. Monitoring and assessment of these expenditures are fundamental for evaluating and orienting public policies in oral health.

Resumen: El objetivo fue analizar los gastos privados con asistencia odontológica y productos de higiene bucal de los brasileños. Se analizaron datos de 55.970 domicilios seleccionados en la Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares de 2008-2009. Los gastos fueron descritos según macrorregiones, estados y capitales do Brasil, y de acuerdo con características socioeconómicas y demográficas de los domicilios (sexo, edad, color de piel y escolaridad del cabeza de familia, renta domiciliaria per cápita y presencia del anciano en el domicilio). Los brasileños gastaron de media durante el año R$ 42,19 en servicios de asistencia odontológica y R$ 10,27 con productos de higiene bucal. Se hallaron desigualdades sociales en la distribución de esos gastos, según las características de los residentes de los domicilios, y conforme las diferentes macrorregiones, estados y capitales del país. El presente estudio evidenció con detalle cuánto y en qué gastan los brasileños respecto a la asistencia odontológica y productos de higiene bucal. El monitoreo y evaluación de estos gastos son condiciones fundamentales para la evaluación y orientación de políticas públicas en salud bucal.

The influence of health expenditures on household impoverishment in Brazil / Influência dos gastos em saúde no empobrecimento de domicílios no Brasil

OBJECTIVE To analyze the variation in the proportion of households living below the poverty line in Brazil and the factors associated with their impoverishment. METHODS Income and expenditure data from the Household Budget Survey, which was conducted in Brazil between 2002-2003 (n = 48,470 households) and 2008-2009 (n = 55,970 households) with a national sample, were analyzed. Two cutoff points were used to define poverty. The first cutoff is a per capita monthly income below R$100.00 in 2002-2003 and R$140.00 in 2008-2009, as recommended by the Bolsa Família Program. The second, which is proposed by the World Bank and is adjusted for purchasing power parity, defines poverty as per capita income below US$2.34 and US$3.54 per day in 2002-2003 and 2008-2009, respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with the impoverishment of households. RESULTS After subtracting health expenditures, there was an increase in households living below the poverty line in Brazil. Using the World Bank poverty line, the increase in 2002-2003 and 2008-2009 was 2.6 percentage points (6.8%) and 2.3 percentage points (11.6%), respectively. Using the Bolsa Família Program poverty line, the increase was 1.6 (11.9%) and 1.3 (17.3%) percentage points, respectively. Expenditure on prescription drugs primarily contributed to the increase in poor households. According to the World Bank poverty line, the factors associated with impoverishment include a worse-off financial situation, a household headed by an individual with low education, the presence of children, and the absence of older adults. Using the Bolsa Família Program poverty line, the factors associated with impoverishment include a worse-off financial situation and the presence of children. CONCLUSIONS Health expenditures play an important role in the impoverishment of segments of the Brazilian population, especially among the most disadvantaged. .

OBJETIVO Analisar a variação na proporção de domicílios vivendo abaixo da linha de pobreza no Brasil e os fatores associados ao empobrecimento. MÉTODOS Foram analisados os dados de despesa e renda das Pesquisas de Orçamentos Familiares conduzidas no Brasil em 2002-2003 (n = 48.470 domicílios) e 2008-2009 (n = 55.970 domicílios) com amostra representativa nacional. Foram utilizados dois pontos de corte para definir pobreza. O primeiro, recomendado pelo Programa Bolsa-Família, considerou pobreza rendimento per capita mensal inferior a R$100,00 em 2002-2003 e a R$140,00 em 2008-2009. O segundo, proposto pelo Banco Mundial, incorpora a correção pela paridade do poder de compra, resultando em US$2,34 por dia, em 2002-2003, e US$3,54, em 2008-2009. Para identificar os fatores sociodemográficos associados ao empobrecimento dos domicílios foi utilizada regressão logística. RESULTADOS Houve acréscimo de domicílios vivendo abaixo da linha de pobreza no Brasil após subtração dos gastos em saúde. Considerando-se a linha de pobreza recomendada pelo Banco Mundial, em 2002-2003 o acréscimo foi 2,6 pontos percentuais (ou 6,8%) e, em 2008-2009, 2,3 pontos percentuais (ou 11,6%). Considerando-se a linha de pobreza utilizada pelo Programa Bolsa-Família, a variação foi 1,6 (11,9%) e 1,3 (17,3%), respectivamente. Gastos com medicamentos foram os que mais contribuíram para o aumento de domicílios pobres. Os fatores associados ao empobrecimento, segundo a linha de pobreza do Banco Mundial, foram apresentar pior situação econômica, ser chefiado por indivíduo com baixa escolaridade, presença de crianças e ausência de idosos. Utilizando-se a linha de pobreza do Bolsa-Família, os fatores associados foram apresentar pior situação econômica e presença de crianças. ...

Disposición a pagar por vacunas contra el virus papiloma humano en la Región Metropolitana de Santiago de Chile / Willingness to pay for human papillomavirus vaccine in Metropolitan Santiago, Chile

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a risk factor for cervical cancer and can be prevented with the HPV vaccine. Aim: To explore the willingness of parents to pay for HPV vaccine for their offspring. Material and Methods: A survey about the willingness to pay for HPV vaccine was answered by 386 individuals of the highest socioeconomic level who had a daughter aged between 12 and 18 years. The survey included information about the risks of HPV infection. Results: Parents would pay a mean of US$ 758 for the vaccine. Twenty five percent of parents were not willing to pay for it. If the cost of the vaccine would be reduced by 50%, only 4% of parents would not pay for it. The willingness to pay is associated with the price of the vaccine, the income level of respondents and the size of the family. Conclusions: Most respondents would pay for HPV vaccine for their daughters, despite the relatively high cost.

Equity and accessibility in health? Out-of-pocket expenditures on health care in middle income countries: evidence from Mexico / ¿Equidad y accesibilidad en salud? Gasto personal de los usuarios en países de ingresos medios: evidencias desde México

This study analyzes the results of a cross-sectional survey which set out to determine the costs to patients of searching for and receiving health care in public and private institutions. The information analyzed was obtained from the study population of the Mexican National Health Survey. The dependent variable was the out-of-pocket users' costs and the independent variables were the insurance conditions, type of institution and income. The empirical findings suggest that there is a need for a more detailed analysis of user costs in middle income countries in general, where the health system is based on social security, public assistance and private institutions. This study shows that the out of pocket costs faced by users are inequitable and fall disproportionately upon socially and economically marginalized populations.

Se presentan los resultados de un estudio transversal, cuyo principal objetivo fue determinar los costos personales de los usuarios en el proceso de búsqueda, obtención y seguimiento de la atención a la salud en instituciones públicas y privadas del sistema mexicano de salud. La información fue obtenida de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de México. La variable dependiente se refirió a los costos personales de los usuarios y como variables independientes se definieron la condición de aseguramiento, tipo de institución e ingreso económico. Los resultados sugieren que en países de ingresos medios los costos a los usuarios de servicios de salud requieren de un análisis muy detallado, ya que el sistema de salud esta fragmentado en asistencia pública, seguridad social y asistencia privada. Este estudio muestra evidencias de cómo los costos a los usuarios afectan de manera inequitativa a familias de menor ingreso y de mayor marginación social.

Gastos asumidos por la familia durante el ingreso en el hogar / Costs of home-based care for the family

El ingreso en el hogar como alternativa asistencial del nivel primario de atención de salud tiene ventajas en términos de la calidad del servicio así como en relación con la utilización de los recursos estatales, sin embargo, representa un gasto para las economías familiares. Estimar y caracterizar el gasto de bolsillo de pacientes ingresados en el hogar en cuatro grupos básicos de trabajo representativos de diferentes áreas geográficas. Se analizó la información de los pacientes en régimen de ingreso en el hogar, entre julio de 2002 y junio de 2003 en un área del municipio Playa, una del municipio Cruces, otra del municipio Unión de Reyes y una de Fomento. Se estimó el gasto de bolsillo por paciente, por día de estadía y para las causas de ingreso más frecuentes. Se expresó en pesos cubanos no convertibles y en moneda libremente convertible. El 80 por ciento o más de las familias tuvieron algún gasto adicional. En las áreas urbanas el mayor gasto fue en la alimentación y en las áreas rurales los medicamentos. El gasto por trasporte fue importante en el área rural. La mediana del gasto de bolsillo por paciente estuvo entre 109,17 y 31,75 pesos cubanos no convertibles. Por día de estadía el gasto de bolsillo,osciló entre 16,79 y 3,14 pesos cubanos no convertibles. El gasto de bolsillo en moneda libremente convertible no fue importante. El ingreso en el hogar es una carga económica adicional para la familia en especial para el área urbana metropolitana. Se debe profundizar en la razón costo efectividad de los esquemas terapéuticos indicados, así como en el aseguramiento de los medios de diagnósticos en el área de salud.

Home care as an alternative for primary health care is advantageous in terms of quality of service and governmental resource utilization, but it also represents an expenditure for the family. To estimate and to characterize the costs of home care for patients in different geographic areas. Data on patients under home care conditions from July 2002 to June 2003 in different areas located in Playa municipality, Cruces municipality, Union de Reyes municipality and Fomento municipality were analyzed. Expenditures per patient, per stay day and per most frequent causes of home care were estimated and given in Cuban domestic currency and in foreign currency. Eighty percent or more of the families faced some extra expenditure. Food represented the highest cost in urban areas whereas drugs were the main line of expenditure in rural areas. Transportation cost was an important aspect in the rural setting. The median of expenditure per patient ranged from 109.17 to 31.75 Cuban pesos. Expenditure per stay day ranged from 16. 79 to 3.14 Cuban pesos. Foreign currency cost was not significant. Home care is an additional economic burden for the family, particularly in the metropolitan urban setting. Cost-effectiveness of the prescribed therapeutic schemes as well as availability of diagnostic means in the health area should be in-depth analyzed.

What do cancer registry and household expenditure data in Japan tell us about variation in tumour burden ?

Data from the total of six Japanese Cancer Registries presently reporting to Cancer Incidence in Five Continents demonstrate marked variation in relative prevalence of cancers at particular sites, despite the genetic homogeneity of the Japanese population. Thus either major differences in registry procedures or local environment must be playing an important role and since the variation is clearly changing with time, the former must be considered likely. Over the last 25 year period, incidence rates for the esophagus have been generally increasing in Japan, except in Miyagi where they have been persistently high. Stomach cancer rates are on the decrease, although the trend is not so clear in Yamagata and Hiroshima, while colon and rectal cancers have both demonstrated consistent increment throughout the period surveyed, with a remarkable correlation between the two sites evident on cross-registry comparisons. Continued increases have also been apparent in lung, kidney, urinary bladder and prostate cancers in males and in breast, endometrium and thyroid neoplasms in females. Cervical cancer, in contrast, is decreasing, although a plateau may now have been reached in Miyagi. In the hepatopancreatic axis, patterns have generally showed elevation followed by a recent reduction, although without correlations among liver, gallbladder and pancreas rates at the cross-registry level. Common lifestyle factors may to some extent underly the increases seen in colon, breast, urinary bladder and thyroid incidence rates, given the significant relations apparent for these in the latest data across registries. Whether analysis of variation in dietary intake and exposure to other risk factors, for example using data for household expenditure, may provide clues to explaining the variation apparent across Japan is a question warranting further consideration. If so an expanded role for the cancer registry could well be envisaged.

Costs of illness and coping strategies in a coffee-growing rural district of Ethiopia.

The paper describes a cross-sectional household survey conducted in randomly-selected villages in rural Ethiopia to assess strategies of households for coping with financial and time costs of illness. Results of the survey showed that the average monthly household health expenditure was 32.87 Birr (about 4.1 US dollars [1 US dollar = 8 Birr at the time of study]). In addition, the average time lost due to illness was 9.23 days for the sick and 7.38 days for their caretakers. Monetary price was a significant (p<0.05) deterrent from visiting health facilities among households with no land or house, the divorced or widowed, and those with annual income less than 500 Birr (62.5 US dollars). The main strategies to cope with the financial costs of illness were waiver privileges, selling household assets, and using savings. Division of labour among household members was used for compensating for the loss of working time due to sickness. The findings of the study indicate that financial and time costs of illness seem to significantly contribute to the impoverishment of rural households.